TED.TALKS.DZ
True/False/Not Given Mastery · Loading
TED.TALKS.DZ
TFNG
Ted.Talks.DZ Back to Library
Reading Strategy

True / False / Not Given

The Binary Filter Protocol — 68% of Band 6.5 candidates lose critical marks on TFNG by using intuition instead of verification. Master the Subject + Claim method.

0 Core Methods
0 Practice Drills
0 Band Target
100% Free
Skill: Academic Reading
Level: Band 6.5 → 7.5+
Source: Examiner Calibration
"
Examiner Insider · Ted Khercha

"When we write IELTS questions, we are not looking for your interpretation. We are testing your ability to verify logical equivalents. During calibration sessions, if a question requires reading between the lines, we reject it. The answer is always mathematically present in the text."

— Ted Khercha · Ted.Talks.DZ

LOGIC
Chapter 01

The Binary Filter Protocol

Stop guessing between False and Not Given — switch from intuition to mathematical verification.

VISUAL FRAMEWORK

TFNG Binary Filter Decision Tree A three-step flowchart: Step 1 isolate the claim verb using Subject plus Claim Method, Step 2 scan the text for evidence, then branch to True if confirmed, False if contradicted, or Not Given if absent. READ THE CLAIM STEP 1 — Isolate the claim verb Subject + Claim Method STEP 2 — Scan text for evidence Confirmed / Contradicted / Absent? confirmed absent contradicted ✓ TRUE ? NOT GIVEN ✗ FALSE

The Reality: 68% Lose Marks Here

You are in the exam room. You have 18 minutes left. You reach questions 21-26. You find the keyword. You read the sentence. You pause. Is it False or Not Given? That hesitation costs you 45 seconds per question.

In the marking room, we see the result: 68% of candidates stuck at Band 6.5 lose their critical marks here. They treat TFNG as a comprehension test. It isn't.

If you are guessing between False and Not Given, you are using intuition. To hit Band 7.5+, you must switch to binary verification.

Step 1 — Isolate the Claim

Subject + Claim Method

Every TFNG question consists of a Subject (what we are talking about — names, dates, nouns) and a Claim (the controlling idea — verbs, adjectives, comparisons).

The drug was initially tested on humans in 1998.
Subject: The drug / 1998 Claim: Tested on humans / initially

Once you isolate both parts, locate the Subject in the text, then run the Claim through the binary gate.

Step 2 — The Logic Gate

Binary Filter

1
Does the text mention the Claim?
NONOT GIVEN — Stop here. Do not think "maybe." The Subject is there but the specific Claim is missing.
2
Does the text AGREE with the Claim?
YESTRUE — Synonyms used, meaning identical. NOFALSE — Antonyms used, or specific details contradict.
The Critical Distinction

The "Not Given" Trap

Not Given does not mean "I can't find it." Not Given means the Subject is there, but the specific Claim is missing.

Feature Band 6 Logic — The Guess Examiner Logic — The Verification
Text "Mr. Smith likes apples."
Statement "Mr. Smith prefers apples to oranges."
Thinking "He likes apples, so maybe he prefers them? Or maybe False because it doesn't mention oranges?" Does the text contain a comparison? No.NOT GIVEN.
Error Uses outside knowledge and assumptions. Checks only what is written in the text.
Band 6 vs Band 8 Processing

Excavation Site Analysis

"While the excavation site yielded over 300 distinct pottery fragments, carbon dating suggests the settlement was abandoned abruptly due to flooding, rather than the previously assumed warfare."

Statement 1: "Archaeologists found evidence of battle at the excavation site."

Feature Band 6.0 Process Band 8.0 Process
Focus Reads the whole sentence, sees "warfare," gets confused by "previously assumed." Isolates the claim: Did they find evidence of battle?
Keyword Match Matches "excavation" and "warfare." Matches "warfare" but notes the modifier "previously assumed."
Reasoning "It mentions warfare, but says it was flooding. So it's False? Or maybe they found weapons?" The text says warfare was "assumed" (past theory), but the evidence points to flooding.
Decision Hesitant False (often changes to True). Confident FALSE. The text contradicts that battle evidence was the cause.
Statement 2: "The pottery fragments were mostly red in color."

Run the filter — your verdict?

NOT GIVEN
Claim: "Mostly red in color." → Text: Mentions "300 distinct pottery fragments." Does it mention color? No. Do not assume "clay is red." Outside knowledge = automatic fail.
Test Yourself

Logic Check

The text says "Most scientists agree the theory is unproven." The statement says "All scientists reject the theory." What is the answer?
True — both sentences refer to the same scientific theory.
False — "Most" contradicts "All," and "unproven" contradicts "reject."
Not Given — we do not have information about "all" scientists.
PRACTICE
Chapter 02

Mozart Effect Practice

Apply the Subject + Claim method to three statements. Do not use outside knowledge.

Read Carefully — Then Apply the Filter

"The 'Mozart Effect' — the theory that listening to classical music improves cognitive function — has been widely debated. A 2015 meta-analysis of 40 studies found that while listening to music elevates mood and arousal, which can temporarily boost performance on spatial tasks, there is no evidence of a permanent increase in IQ."

Examiner's Breakdown

Apply the Filter

1. The 2015 study proved that classical music has no effect on human emotion.

Run the filter — your verdict?

FALSE
Subject: 2015 study / classical music / emotion. → Claim: "No effect on emotion." → Text: "...elevates mood and arousal." → "Elevates mood" contradicts "no effect." → FALSE.
2. Listening to music can lead to short-term improvements in completing specific tasks.

Run the filter — your verdict?

TRUE
Subject: Music / improvements / tasks. → Claim: "Short-term improvements" / "specific tasks." → Text: "temporarily boost performance" / "spatial tasks." → "Temporarily" = "Short-term." "Spatial tasks" = "Specific tasks." → TRUE.
3. Researchers in the 2015 study preferred Mozart over Beethoven.

Run the filter — your verdict?

NOT GIVEN
Subject: Researchers / 2015 study. → Claim: "Preferred Mozart over Beethoven." → Text: Mentions "Mozart Effect" and "music." Does the text compare researchers' preference for composers? No. It is legally impossible to answer based only on the text provided. → NOT GIVEN.
"
Critical Distinction

"If the text says 'The project might finish early,' and the statement says 'The project will finish early' — that is False. Certainty contradicts possibility. Watch for qualifiers like all, some, mainly, often, always."

— Ted Khercha · Ted.Talks.DZ

RULES
Chapter 03

Quick Reference Rules

Six rules to screenshot before your exam.

Screenshot This — TFNG Rules
  • Qualifiers change everything: Watch for words like all, some, mainly, often, always. Text: "Most people…" / Statement: "Everyone…" = FALSE.
  • Comparison Trap: If the statement compares A and B, check if the text actually compares them. If it lists A and B separately = NOT GIVEN.
  • The Possibility Rule: Text: "might finish early" / Statement: "will finish early" = FALSE. Certainty contradicts possibility.
  • Order of Appearance: In 95% of Academic Reading papers, TFNG questions follow text order. If you found Q1 and Q3, Q2 is between them.
  • "Not Given" means: Subject is there, but the specific Claim is missing. Not "I can't find it."
  • Outside Knowledge = Automatic Fail: Do not assume "clay is red" or "scientists prefer Mozart." Only what is in the text matters.
Test Yourself

Final Check

The text says "The project might finish ahead of schedule." The statement says "The project will finish ahead of schedule." What is the answer?
True — both sentences say the project finishes early.
Not Given — we cannot predict the future.
False — "might" (possibility) contradicts "will" (certainty).
Active Recall

Complete the Strategy

1. In TFNG, every question has a and a Claim.
2. If the text does not mention the Claim at all, the answer is .
3. If the text uses an antonym to contradict the Claim, the answer is .
4. Text: "Most people…" / Statement: "Everyone…" = because qualifiers change the meaning.
5. In 95% of papers, TFNG answers appear in the same as the text.
Key Rules

Common TFNG Mistakes

Why is Not Given the hardest answer? +

Band 7 candidates fall here because they overthink. Not Given means the Subject is present but the specific Claim is absent. Students try to "reason it out" instead of running the binary gate. The rule is simple: if the Claim is not in the text, stop and mark Not Given.

What is the difference between False and Not Given? +

False = the text directly contradicts the statement (antonyms, opposite facts). Not Given = the text does not contain the information needed. If you cannot verify the Claim from the text alone, it is Not Given.

Why should I never use my own knowledge? +

IELTS Reading tests verification ability, not general knowledge. If the text says "The sky is green" and the question asks "Is the sky green?", the answer is TRUE based on the text — even though you know the sky is blue. Outside knowledge = automatic fail.

What if I cannot find the answer in 60 seconds? +

The 60-Second Rule: If you haven't found the answer in 60 seconds, guess and move on. The easy marks count the same as the hard ones. Come back later if you have time.

Timed Practice

45-Second Filter Drill

Train speed on the binary gate. Read the statement. Find the Subject in the text. Check the Claim. Decide. 45 seconds max per question — that is your exam pace.

00:45
Time Strategy

TFNG Timing

Recommended time allocation per TFNG question set. The 45-second ceiling prevents one question from destroying your entire passage score.

Per Question
45 sec
Set of 5
3.75 min
Max per Set
5 min
0/10
Your Progress
Work through each strategy below.
Complete All Strategies to Unlock
FINAL THOUGHT

Ted Khercha · Ted.Talks.DZ · IELTS Reading TFNG Strategy